| Title |
Practical Barriers and Facilitators Experienced by Patients, Pharmacists and Physicians to the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Screening in Dutch Outpatient Hospital Care—An Explorative Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Personalized Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/jpm10040293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pauline Lanting, Evelien Drenth, Ludolf Boven, Amanda van Hoek, Annemiek Hijlkema, Ellen Poot, Gerben van der Vries, Robert Schoevers, Ernst Horwitz, Reinold Gans, Jos Kosterink, Mirjam Plantinga, Irene van Langen, Adelita Ranchor, Cisca Wijmenga, Lude Franke, Bob Wilffert, Rolf Sijmons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 67% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,622,293
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personalized Medicine
#432
of 2,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,046
of 503,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personalized Medicine
#38
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.