| Title |
Persistence of somatic symptoms after COVID-19 in the Netherlands: an observational cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01214-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aranka V Ballering, Sander K R van Zon, Tim C olde Hartman, Judith G M Rosmalen |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,556 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 577 | 9% |
| Japan | 504 | 8% |
| Canada | 242 | 4% |
| Germany | 220 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 166 | 3% |
| Australia | 130 | 2% |
| Spain | 94 | 1% |
| Thailand | 78 | 1% |
| Mexico | 71 | 1% |
| Other | 612 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3862 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5810 | 89% |
| Scientists | 363 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 270 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 104 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 346 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 158 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 13% |
| Unknown | 173 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4958. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#799
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#64
of 41,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 422,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#3
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.