| Title |
Feasibility of Imaging-Based 3-Dimensional Models to Design Patient-Specific Osteosynthesis Plates and Drilling Guides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37519 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank F. A. IJpma, Anne M. L. Meesters, Bram B. J. Merema, Kaj ten Duis, Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries, Hester Banierink, Klaus W. Wendt, Joep Kraeima, Max J. H. Witjes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 57% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,622,209
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#6,915
of 7,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,710
of 421,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#453
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.