↓ Skip to main content

University of Groningen

Developing a clinical prediction rule for repeated consultations with functional somatic symptoms in primary care: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Developing a clinical prediction rule for repeated consultations with functional somatic symptoms in primary care: a cohort study
Published in
BMJ Open, January 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gea A Holtman, Huibert Burger, Robert A Verheij, Hans Wouters, Marjolein Y Berger, Judith GM Rosmalen, Peter FM Verhaak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,409,395
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#9,850
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,278
of 519,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#290
of 768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.