| Title |
Prospective clinical validation of the Eleveld propofol pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model in general anaesthesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Remco Vellinga, Laura N Hannivoort, Michele Introna, Daan J Touw, Anthony R Absalom, Douglas J Eleveld, Michel M R F Struys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 18% |
| France | 2 | 12% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,050,309
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#1,355
of 6,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,647
of 525,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#43
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.