↓ Skip to main content

University of Groningen

Article Metrics

Psychological distress among frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Psychological distress among frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0255510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wieke E. van der Goot, Robbert J. Duvivier, Nico W. Van Yperen, Marco A. de Carvalho-Filho, Kirsten E. Noot, Renee Ikink, Rijk O. B. Gans, Eveline Kloeze, Jaap E. Tulleken, A. J. Jolanda Lammers, A. Debbie C. Jaarsma, Wouter F. W. Bierman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,269,175
of 19,296,398 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#39,895
of 172,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,593
of 335,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#101
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,296,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.