| Title |
Psychological distress among frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0255510 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wieke E. van der Goot, Robbert J. Duvivier, Nico W. Van Yperen, Marco A. de Carvalho-Filho, Kirsten E. Noot, Renee Ikink, Rijk O. B. Gans, Eveline Kloeze, Jaap E. Tulleken, A. J. Jolanda Lammers, A. Debbie C. Jaarsma, Wouter F. W. Bierman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 75 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 14% |
| Psychology | 18 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,889,142
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,987
of 199,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,258
of 432,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#713
of 2,661 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,661 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.